The topic of "Why I want to be a slave to my mate - issues in flr - aboutflr.com" is covered from the viewpoint of the Author of this website, what Experts say about "Why I want to be a slave to my mate - issues in flr - aboutflr.com" and how our users feel about the subject. You can participate freely. We invite expert opinion via email. We value all kinds of information such as: research, anecdotal information and perspective.
Discussion Home > Loving Male Service, Socialization and Transformation > Why I want to be a slave to my mate
Many of thoughtful people have contributed to the authorship of this website. The authors of this website have thought long and hard about the topic of "Why I want to be a slave to my mate - issues in flr - aboutflr.com". We hope you find our viewpoint helpful and thought provoking
I have talked about this for some years now and go back and forth on how it could be implemented but there is no doubt that some men want it and a smaller number of women do too. So why do you want it and how does it improve your relationship?
Author: 2011-06-23 16:56:31 [reply]
A wiseman once told me that EVERYONE has something worth listening too and when you listen enough you will get smarter. We value the ideas and opinions of our readers on the topic of "Why I want to be a slave to my mate - issues in flr - aboutflr.com. "True genius resides in the capacity for evaluation of uncertain, hazardous, and conflicting information." Winston Churchill (British Orator, Author and Prime Minister during World War II. 1874-1965)
i[I] would love to be my W[w]ife's slave...branding and the whole bit, but S[s]he would never go for that. At the moment, i[I]'m trying to ease H[h]er into a 2-3 level FLR way of living. - edited by staff (female, she, her and wife and not capitalized except at the beginning of a sentence, i for men is not lower case)
Author: 2011-08-24 20:33:05 [reply]
I have wrestled on both sides of this and decided that although practiced by some, for me this is just an expression of FLR Dark, all fantasy meant to keep the cycle going, without leading anywhere real. At the core of it there is a compelling desire to be completely without agency, but although this can be played with for brief amounts of time, I know that for me, it doesn't get me where I want to go personally or in my relationship with my wife.
Author: 2011-08-24 23:29:21 [reply]
I think being slave to a woman would be the easiest way. Being experienced in relationships of this type I only can say that a clear line is the best and easiest way having a FLR without problems. The girls or women in my life were as simple and clear as most women use to be and preferred clear and strict rules being the mistress.
Author: 2012-02-23 01:11:59 [reply]
Frederik So do you feel because it is the easiest way as you stated it is harder for women? Maybe more work for them and less for you?
Reply by: 2012-02-26 13:52:21 [reply]
I'm definitely excited by the idea, but a little unsure of how much is reality, and how much is fantasy. I mean, would you move together with and plan a church wedding with someone you've just dated for the first time? For the same reason, would you run straight into slave mode with a new woman you've just met? Trust and intimacy is what is required in both cases, and this can only be built over time. As much as I'm sure there are women I'd love to surrender to, I'm sure there are those I definitely should stay away from. So, is it more than just fantasy... well, time will have to tell.
Author: 2012-04-07 10:37:17 [reply]
I think that accepting some level of total power exchange, call it whatever you wish is probably what most people here are looking for and why they are not looking on Match.com or any vanilla dating website. TPE also makes the rules quite simple. You my lady are the boss and I am yours to command as you wish. If you want me to diet, just give me to eat what you wish. If you want my in chastity, I will obey. YOu can still have the loving relationship you all muse with here within the framework of total control. In this type of relationship, the woman can love her man, but as a somewhat inferior who for his best interests needs to be trained and disciplined by her. By constraining his wild ideas, he can better serve her which will make her happy and pleasured whenever she wants. He will not stray and will be loyal to her loving the relationship he has been longing for taking his natural place on his knees beside her....what is wrong with that?
Author: 2012-10-08 16:14:00 [reply]
Cbotrader sounds to me like you don't want a loving relationship, you want a relationship based on rules. Total power exchange is not the same as surrender and love and relations based on pleasure sound like trading away love for sex. I think you are way off.
Reply by: 2012-10-28 07:56:55 [reply]
I have been doing some thinking about this. Slave as an expression of love given to your wife because she has a high need for control is quite different than as slave as property where she is a ruthless domme. There should be a place in the world for men who just want to surrender for her sake and for loves sake. I like the idea of minion and servile better than property as the words speak to a passion like the passion of love where some men choose to give all of themselves. Now we just need men that are like that! It does sound at all kinky.
Author: 2013-01-22 21:23:06 [reply]