John Public. It was interesting to read your reaction. Bottom men are never satisfied—if I write a lot, it’s bad; if I reply briefly, that’s also bad. Yesterday, I got a message from a “older sissy cuck” (That’s how She/he/they introduced himself) from Atlanta, “relocatable”, and from what I understood, since She/he/they works from home, She/he/they is looking for a house from which She/he/they can work. I looked around and realized I don’t want to see a working sissy in my house. The She/he/they suggested I visit She/he/they profile to see if we’re a good match and would determine if we have something in common between us. On She/he/they page, I saw absolutely no description—zero, nothing. All I learned was that he/she’s 54 and that she’s a man. But really, I’m in Florida—what could I possibly have in common with “older sissy cuck” who’s in Atlanta? I replied briefly: “We have nothing in common”. And do you know what I got from She/he/they in response? This is what “older sissy cuck” wrote to me: “Apparently not as you seem to have the brain size of a hummingbird”. Very often, I don’t respond to messages at all. Precisely because when my reply is polite, and free of insults—but doesn’t include fireworks of enthusiasm about what she/he/they wrote to me—the next thing I get is an insult. Apparently, the most common message women receive from bottom men is an insult. I’d really like to know why this happens. She/he/they asked me one question, and I answered it. Why insult me afterward? What’s the point?